|
|
wikipedia and physical therapy
|
Logged in as: Guest
|
|
Users viewing this topic:
none
|
|
Login | |
|
wikipedia and physical therapy - March 5, 2008 8:58:18 AM
|
|
|
rwillcott
Posts: 425
Joined: March 20, 2006
From: Canada
Status: offline
|
I was recently on Wikipedia and thought I would take a look at the definition of physical therapy. Under the section 'Physical Therapy and Science' it states that there is a lack of research and science to support what we do. It goes on to state that many physical therapist's base there assessment and treatment on anecdotal evidence. I thought we all could take some time do edit the definition of physical therapy. I couldn't think of a better group of editors then those who are part of this site! Thanks, Rob
|
|
|
|
RE: wikipedia and physical therapy - March 5, 2008 10:26:52 AM
|
|
|
proud
Posts: 941
Joined: March 22, 2006
Status: offline
|
quote:
ORIGINAL: rwillcott I was recently on Wikipedia and thought I would take a look at the definition of physical therapy. Under the section 'Physical Therapy and Science' it states that there is a lack of research and science to support what we do. It goes on to state that many physical therapist's base there assessment and treatment on anecdotal evidence. I thought we all could take some time do edit the definition of physical therapy. I couldn't think of a better group of editors then those who are part of this site! Thanks, Rob No question about it. Given my lack of computer saavy...I suggest yourself along with superb regulars like Jason Harris, orthotherapist, Tom Reeves, Sebastian Asselbergs fix that mess up.
|
|
|
|
RE: wikipedia and physical therapy - March 5, 2008 10:40:05 AM
|
|
|
Tom Reeves DPT ATC
Posts: 445
Joined: March 14, 2006
Status: offline
|
I wouldn't know the first thing about editing a Wikipedia site.
|
|
|
|
RE: wikipedia and physical therapy - March 5, 2008 12:39:38 PM
|
|
|
OAK
Posts: 184
Joined: September 1, 2003
Status: offline
|
Thanks for the notification. I removed that section.
|
|
|
|
RE: wikipedia and physical therapy - March 5, 2008 12:45:41 PM
|
|
|
rwillcott
Posts: 425
Joined: March 20, 2006
From: Canada
Status: offline
|
Thanks OAK! When I have time I'm going to make some contributions to the definition. I assume if you're registered to wikipedia you can edit? Rob
|
|
|
|
RE: wikipedia and physical therapy - March 5, 2008 12:47:28 PM
|
|
|
OAK
Posts: 184
Joined: September 1, 2003
Status: offline
|
quote:
ORIGINAL: rwillcott Thanks OAK! When I have time I'm going to make some contributions to the definition. I assume if you're registered to wikipedia you can edit? Rob Looks like it. That's the first time I've edited Wikipedia.
|
|
|
|
RE: wikipedia and physical therapy - March 5, 2008 12:51:27 PM
|
|
|
rwillcott
Posts: 425
Joined: March 20, 2006
From: Canada
Status: offline
|
I wonder who would have wrote that in the first place? I can't see a physical therapist writing that?
|
|
|
|
RE: wikipedia and physical therapy - March 5, 2008 1:42:24 PM
|
|
|
jma
Posts: 2405
Joined: August 24, 2000
From: NY
Status: offline
|
Agree with that. Rewrite that definition!
|
|
|
|
RE: wikipedia and physical therapy - March 5, 2008 9:30:08 PM
|
|
|
aph401
Posts: 82
Joined: April 16, 2007
Status: offline
|
Glad yall are doing something about this, but I've noticed that wikipedia edits are typically reversed within a few days, max. Hopefully this one will stay!
|
|
|
|
RE: wikipedia and physical therapy - March 5, 2008 10:33:55 PM
|
|
|
Sebastian Asselbergs
Posts: 1191
Joined: September 29, 1999
From: Barrie, Canada
Status: offline
|
Rob, sad as that definition is, it does seem to be the practice of large numbers of PTs (CST, MFR, PPRT, US and other magic bullet alphabytes). Having said that - I am glad it is changed - thanks OAK! And thanks for your confidence proud, but so far I am only a Wiki user. Mmmmh, maybe this will drive me to registering and editing....
_____________________________
Mundi vult decipi
|
|
|
|
RE: wikipedia and physical therapy - March 5, 2008 11:18:25 PM
|
|
|
OAK
Posts: 184
Joined: September 1, 2003
Status: offline
|
quote:
ORIGINAL: aph401 Glad yall are doing something about this, but I've noticed that wikipedia edits are typically reversed within a few days, max. Hopefully this one will stay! It was changed back so I deleted it again. Luckily I have alot of time on my hands!
|
|
|
|
RE: wikipedia and physical therapy - March 6, 2008 12:13:00 PM
|
|
|
OAK
Posts: 184
Joined: September 1, 2003
Status: offline
|
quote:
ORIGINAL: OAK quote:
ORIGINAL: aph401 Glad yall are doing something about this, but I've noticed that wikipedia edits are typically reversed within a few days, max. Hopefully this one will stay! It was changed back so I deleted it again. Luckily I have alot of time on my hands! It was changed so I deleted it again. Now I've had my IP address banned from wikipedia edits! It shows you how reliable this website is.
< Message edited by OAK -- March 6, 2008 12:15:48 PM >
|
|
|
|
RE: wikipedia and physical therapy - March 6, 2008 4:42:10 PM
|
|
|
jlharris
Posts: 476
Joined: April 12, 2006
From: Nebraska
Status: offline
|
I've made an edit to the page before. But now when I do, one user undoes it everytime (and I'm not trying to delete that whole entry). BTW, have no idea how I can have a conversation with that user over this. Do any of you? He says something to the effect that I have a conflict of interest, so my edits are being undone.
_____________________________
Jason L. Harris, PT, DPT My PT Blog
|
|
|
|
RE: wikipedia and physical therapy - March 6, 2008 8:09:55 PM
|
|
|
SJBird55
Posts: 2430
Joined: May 10, 2004
From: Michigan
Status: offline
|
This comment was left for JzG on "user talk." quote:
PT Anecdotal Evidence Hi JzG. I have asked User:JlharrisDPT to quit undoing your addition of a quote regarding anecdotal-based PT practices, as determined by the peer-reviewed journal you cited. Keep up the good work! --Email4jonathan (talk) 22:41, 6 March 2008 (UTC)
|
|
|
|
RE: wikipedia and physical therapy - March 6, 2008 11:07:23 PM
|
|
|
Shill
Posts: 1092
Joined: February 13, 2003
From: Madison WI USA
Status: offline
|
I guess one thing that should be done is to look up on wikipedia the definition for subluxation, to see how that one reads! Or perhaps chiropractic as a whole. If there are statements regarding anecdotal evidence there, then I guess this could be an easier pill to swallow. I believe two things about that quote that they use. 1) It is taken out of context and re-worded to sound a bit worse than it did in the paper itself. 2) The initial study was done in 1997 and 1999 ( I believe), and not published until 2005, which may or may not be meaningful that it took that long to get it published. Regardless, it is likely data from prior to 1997 and 1999, which may be a reflection of a time when the push for evidence was less.
_____________________________
Steve Hill PT
|
|
|
|
New Messages |
No New Messages |
Hot Topic w/ New Messages |
Hot Topic w/o New Messages |
Locked w/ New Messages |
Locked w/o New Messages |
|
Post New Thread
Reply to Message
Post New Poll
Submit Vote
Delete My Own Post
Delete My Own Thread
Rate Posts |
|
0.156
|