RehabEdge Physical Therapy Forum

Forums  Register  Login  Forgot Login?
  My Profile 
My Subscription
  My Forums 
Search
  FAQ  Log Out
Follow @RehabEdge

Back brace

 
Logged in as: Guest
Users viewing this topic: none
  Printable Version
All Forums >> [RehabEdge Forum] >> Orthopedics >> Back brace Page: [1]
Login
Message << Older Topic   Newer Topic >>
Back brace - February 9, 2011 12:48:10 PM   
ragempt

 

Posts: 212
Joined: August 15, 2006
From: linden, michigan
Status: offline
Very against these based on own personal, jaded opinion on Mckenzie principals, and the ignorant need to perform joint mobs on everyone based on my own personal bias. Anyway had a rep stop by to show me a study trying to change my opinion on lumbar elastic braces. Here is his supporting research:
http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/19179915

Effectiveness of a lumbar belt in subacute low back pain: an open, multicentric, and randomized clinical study.

Any smart research people out there can give their opinion?
Post #: 1
RE: Back brace - February 9, 2011 4:16:43 PM   
Myostrain

 

Posts: 327
Joined: September 25, 2008
Status: offline
Sans the last line since I didn't read the full article; often medical studies for LBP the control group is medication and may education/rest. Probably not active conservative therapy. Based on the location, maybe the control group also includes MHP/CP in addition to rest/meds.
Without knowing what the control group really had and whether or not the back brace group had anything else as well; that abstract means nothing.

(in reply to ragempt)
Post #: 2
RE: Back brace - February 9, 2011 5:16:51 PM   
ginger

 

Posts: 1193
Joined: February 27, 2005
From: Melbourne Victoria
Status: offline
For those with risky work and already in pain it's a valuable device to transmit forces through a strengthened muscular cage and less thorough the vertebral column. Analogous to a hard hat or steel capped boots. Not a substitute for self management or focussed manual therapies ( mobs in particular ) to restore a non protected mobile state to the low back, but a worthwhile addition in some cases. Agree with Myo, the extract says too little.

(in reply to Myostrain)
Post #: 3
RE: Back brace - February 10, 2011 8:25:08 AM   
Shill

 

Posts: 1377
Joined: February 14, 2003
From: Madison WI USA
Status: offline
I have access to the full text and will read it.  I am not a smart research person though, so be forewarned. 
As an aside, I think each brace should be labeled with "this is to remind you to not do anything stupid", and they would likely be proven to work.

(in reply to ginger)
Post #: 4
RE: Back brace - February 10, 2011 8:23:05 PM   
ginger

 

Posts: 1193
Joined: February 27, 2005
From: Melbourne Victoria
Status: offline
Shill, agree, they do serve to act as a reminder , like the bandage on a sore limb, to be careful. The comment I most often get though, is that their use increases confidence , such that antalgic postures and movements are reduced. I recommend their use as a preventative measure most often , rather than a way out of pain when established. Eg, before you, shovel the cement, lift the beams,encounter a potentially dangerous situation, check, hard hat, boots, goggles, brace.

(in reply to Shill)
Post #: 5
RE: Back brace - February 10, 2011 11:21:59 PM   
bonez

 

Posts: 701
Joined: August 29, 2007
Status: offline
Ginger do you not find that they can then become over used thereby defeating the good mechanics that truly will be their saviour in the long run?

(in reply to ginger)
Post #: 6
RE: Back brace - February 11, 2011 1:00:13 AM   
ginger

 

Posts: 1193
Joined: February 27, 2005
From: Melbourne Victoria
Status: offline
No Bonez I don't see that, if anything they are underused. Wearing a brace willl not prevent the recruitment of abdominal muscle, indeed if I see it correctly, theoretically, their use ought to aid in normal recruitment by reducing threat/pain inhibition. At least this appears to be so.

(in reply to bonez)
Post #: 7
RE: Back brace - February 11, 2011 7:14:21 AM   
Sebastian Asselbergs

 

Posts: 2293
Joined: September 30, 1999
From: Barrie, Canada
Status: offline
Good points.
I think that the positive effect that many people have with the non-rigid braces is simply the compression, the sense that the spine and its environment is more safe, and thus triggers reduced levels and fewer neuromuscular defenses. No direct restrictive mechanical effects whatsoever - it is easy to move within the brace.
I agree 100% with Geoff.

(in reply to ginger)
Post #: 8
RE: Back brace - February 24, 2011 6:43:38 PM   
Ray

 

Posts: 9
Joined: February 21, 2005
From: Oreland, Pennsylvania
Status: offline
I feel that a back brace may aid as a reminder and engender confidence but have found overuse very common. There are certainly times when it's use may be of value, but I feel that direct progressive PRE for paraspinal strength and CSA change is the ultimate goal.

(in reply to ragempt)
Post #: 9
RE: Back brace - February 25, 2011 8:37:59 AM   
honker23

 

Posts: 208
Status: offline
I agree with myostrain on this one.  From the article, "For each group the other treatments were left to the discretion of the investigating practitioner."  A lot of variables there to change outcomes.
 
I also agree that they aren't a bad idea for a laborer to use to get them back to work a week or two earlier.

(in reply to Ray)
Post #: 10
RE: Back brace - February 27, 2011 12:34:32 PM   
VagusX

 

Posts: 338
Joined: March 27, 2003
From: Savannah, GA, USA
Status: offline
I didn't read the full text article so I can't look at all the methods. At the very minimum the study looked at what they were attempting to figure out; Belt vs no belt at 30D and 90D. Outcomes were better for Disability, Pain and Medication usage by a clinically significant amount at 30 and 90 days. The EIFEL is a french adaption of the Roland Morris Disability Questionaire which I can't find much research when I did a quick search. I am gathering that this research was done in France, so we can automatically determine that they are working less hours per week than in comparison to your home town....well that might not be as evidenced based.

I agree with Myostrain that a better research method would be to compare belt with exercise, exercise with no belt, belt only and no belt as the control. The method would also have to control for medication.

(in reply to honker23)
Post #: 11
Page:   [1]
All Forums >> [RehabEdge Forum] >> Orthopedics >> Back brace Page: [1]
Jump to:





New Messages No New Messages
Hot Topic w/ New Messages Hot Topic w/o New Messages
Locked w/ New Messages Locked w/o New Messages
 Post New Thread
 Reply to Message
 Post New Poll
 Submit Vote
 Delete My Own Post
 Delete My Own Thread
 Rate Posts



Google Custom Search
Forum Software © ASPPlayground.NET Advanced Edition 2.5.5 Unicode

0.172