PainFree -> RE: ATM2 for back rehab (April 1, 2008 6:31:49 PM)
|
Proud, I am very, very familiar with the research concerning the Mulligan technique. The ATM2 has impressed me with providing a similiar response to those utilizing it. I have my unique reasons for using it as I have previously discussed. Having said that, I agree that Mulligan technique and ATM2 are not one and the same. I did not enter into this discussion to argue the pros and cons or whether the ATM2 has research to back it's use. I was simply adding my comments and moving the discussion along. I neither have the time nor the desire to discuss with you the merits of the ATM2. If you will note, I am also interested in laser and heaven forbid, microcurrent. My past interest have included Mulligan, McKenzie, Kaltenborn and a whole host of taping procedures (some of which have research demonstrating their effective and some of which do not). I have been in practice for 20 years and have seen the good and the bad come and go. Perhaps the ATM2 will join that list. If you are ever in need of used therapy equipment, I probably have what you need collecting dust in the back of my clinic. Feel free to have the last word.
|
|
|
|