|
SJBird55 -> RE: Medicare Question (December 30, 2007 7:53:05 PM)
|
I have not read anything in Medicare rules and regulations for independent physical therapists in an outpatient setting billing under Medicare B to capture a signature of the patient. Documentation requirements for physical therapists practicing in this setting do not have patient signature as an established, expected protocol. What I do because I have reported fraud in the past and there could be a chance that someone might choose to retaliate.... 1) every patient signs in on a label (name, date, time) 2) every patient signs out on a label (name, date, time) 3) my office manager clocks patients in and clocks patients out in the scheduler. After every patient signs in or out, the label is peeled off and stuck on his/her own individual sign in/out sheet. Once the patient is discharged, this sheet is scanned into the medical record. What I have implemented somewhat establishes that the patient was in attendance, so the patient couldn't come back and dispute a date of service. (It is just extra protection for me.) It also assists with total time in the clinic (to capture the non-billable time). What I like about it is that in all honesty, if records were audited, there would be cases where there would be discrepancies in sign in and sign out times along with the clocked in and out times because in the real world, my office manager can't always do it perfectly because of the phone or walk-in prospective patients or initially being in the middle of some other task. My personal opinion on the matter of having a sheet of paper in which patients sign in.... if anyone can read the signatures, then technically the simple fact that the patient has received services isn't confidential. Signatures really don't create the situation that you really are billing for services provided. There are cases that I have heard of in which patients attend one visit and sign in multiple times for "services" (4 weeks or so at a time) and bills are generated for those services. The patient was never treated.... The appearance would be a patient was legitimately treated, but if you put a camera up in that clinic, you would soon see the fraud occurring.
|
|
|
|