|
AdamP -> RE: Interview at St.Augustine (July 27, 2007 10:21:41 AM)
|
First of all, the ignorant comment about USA getting accreditation because of the Paris name was a low blow. (Sounds like someone got rejected). Don’t forget he has alot of people who don’t like him either (including myself). The school offers a superior education and I can say that with confidence. Now the point about being trained (not brainwashed) in a narrow tunnel is partially accurate. I really would recommend going there only if you a certain you want to work in an environment that would allow mobilization. The tunnel is NOT narrow, but there are a few things that are against the institutions philosophy (such as neural tension and cranial sacral) that they are strongly against those. They choose a few poorly researched techniques and let their feelings be known. I have taken a lot of continuing education outside the USA system and remain open minded, but I don’t see how cranial sacral is billed or even considered a PT technique. The school trains very good outpt therapist. On the other hand, if you want to go into Neuro, peds, etc it will probably require some additional post-graduate work to become very good (which is the way most specialties are). I would also recommend looking for a school that encourages professionalism. For example, I think you’d find that USA grads would not insult another therapists education by implying that their school shouldn’t be accredited. Finally, Paris did not encourage inpt traction as a blanket approach to back pain, it was devised as a very specific protocol that got watered down. Besides, he is making his way out of St. Augustine. If you want something that I found the biggest negative of USA…the cost.
|
|
|
|