RehabEdge homepageHost a course at your facilityCEU by topic and providerSearch for CEU by state, topic, format, etc.Comprehensive therapy products and supplies catalogRehabEdge Forum main pageReach thousands of therapists to show off your products and CEUAsk us.  We're here to help.

Re: A novel approach to the DC/(D)PT relationship

 
Logged in as: Guest
Users viewing this topic: none
  Printable Version
All Forums >> [RehabEdge Forum] >> Open Forum >> Re: A novel approach to the DC/(D)PT relationship Page: <<   < prev  1 2 [3]
Login
Message << Older Topic   Newer Topic >>
Re: A novel approach to the DC/(D)PT relationship - March 30, 2007 1:47:00 PM   
ONstudentPT555

 

Posts: 224
Joined: July 25, 2006
Status: offline
I agree with helping our patients get better and doing everything in the best interest of the patient... but where I see a problem arising is that both PTs and DCs in the private sector are inovled in a business to some extent..so when the time comes where both PTs and DCs are essentially doing the same thing and there are 3 DC and PT clinics on every block and everyone is struggling to make a decent living in a saturated market... attitudes may change.....just a thought..

(in reply to Andrew M. Ball PT PhD)
Post #: 41
Re: A novel approach to the DC/(D)PT relationship - March 30, 2007 2:24:00 PM   
nari

 

Posts: 1568
Joined: November 14, 2003
From: Australia
Status: offline
ONstudent,

I can see the point you're making - but if the actual numbers of DCs and PTs remain much the same, and presumably that will be the case, then people will still go to their favourite HP; whether s/he is in the same clinic or in the same block or 2 km away.
In the end, people will choose who suits them best. There would remain enough skills, personality and competence diversity amongst both professionals for that choice to be made.

Nari

(in reply to Andrew M. Ball PT PhD)
Post #: 42
Re: A novel approach to the DC/(D)PT relationship - March 30, 2007 2:28:00 PM   
savela

 

Posts: 63
Joined: October 7, 2004
From: toronto
Status: offline
ONstudent,

Working in Ontario, I would rather have the Chiro owned clinic as competition, than the MD owned referral for profit clinics.

This way the patient has a choice who they wish to go to and the decision is not made for them by the MD.

I do not think in Canada the markets will be saturated, since there are MANY under serviced areas especially up north.

(in reply to Andrew M. Ball PT PhD)
Post #: 43
Re: A novel approach to the DC/(D)PT relationship - March 30, 2007 8:09:00 PM   
ONstudentPT555

 

Posts: 224
Joined: July 25, 2006
Status: offline
Savela,

I do hope you are right ...but if you check the yellow page listings even in the smallest towns in ontario there is an abudance of DC clinics and usually more number of DC private clincs then PT private clinics.

(in reply to Andrew M. Ball PT PhD)
Post #: 44
Re: A novel approach to the DC/(D)PT relationship - April 2, 2007 5:37:00 AM   
Lehmkuhler

 

Posts: 69
Joined: December 14, 2005
Status: offline
DC's tend to practice individually (bad idea) where PT's tend to practice in groups (good idea)... Hence less PT "clinics" but that may not reflect the actual numbers of PT's.

(in reply to Andrew M. Ball PT PhD)
Post #: 45
Re: A novel approach to the DC/(D)PT relationship - April 2, 2007 2:26:00 PM   
ONstudentPT555

 

Posts: 224
Joined: July 25, 2006
Status: offline
I think it has more to do with the fact that PTs work in other areas such as in-patient hospital settings, homecare, schools..other than just private practise and also that from what I can see the PT profession is still somewhat more female dominated .. and from talking to other female PTs .. they are sometimes less likely to open thier own clinic because of family commitments like having kids... so these factors maybe why there are less PT owned clinics.

Why do you think it is a bad idea to practice individually .. I know PTs who own clinics and are the only PTs working there and have other support staff to help out.

(in reply to Andrew M. Ball PT PhD)
Post #: 46
Re: A novel approach to the DC/(D)PT relationship - April 2, 2007 3:32:00 PM   
Lehmkuhler

 

Posts: 69
Joined: December 14, 2005
Status: offline
Individual practice=higher overhead per PT/DC.

Overhead=enemy

I look forward to the day when I am no longer a solo practitioner. I can probably increase my overhead by only 10-20% with another person who could then pay 50% of the total overhead. That leaves more money in my pocket.

(in reply to Andrew M. Ball PT PhD)
Post #: 47
Re: A novel approach to the DC/(D)PT relationship - April 2, 2007 3:45:00 PM   
ONstudentPT555

 

Posts: 224
Joined: July 25, 2006
Status: offline
I guess the trick then is to have enough patients to allow both practitioners to make a decent amount of money.

(in reply to Andrew M. Ball PT PhD)
Post #: 48
Page:   <<   < prev  1 2 [3]
All Forums >> [RehabEdge Forum] >> Open Forum >> Re: A novel approach to the DC/(D)PT relationship Page: <<   < prev  1 2 [3]
Jump to:





New Messages No New Messages
Hot Topic w/ New Messages Hot Topic w/o New Messages
Locked w/ New Messages Locked w/o New Messages
 Post New Thread
 Reply to Message
 Post New Poll
 Submit Vote
 Delete My Own Post
 Delete My Own Thread
 Rate Posts



Google Custom Search
Forum Software © ASPPlayground.NET Advanced Edition 2.5.5 Unicode

0.063