RehabEdge homepageHost a course at your facilityCEU by topic and providerSearch for CEU by state, topic, format, etc.Comprehensive therapy products and supplies catalogRehabEdge Forum main pageReach thousands of therapists to show off your products and CEUAsk us.  We're here to help.

Re: physcial therapy vs chiropractic vs nursing

 
Logged in as: Guest
Users viewing this topic: none
  Printable Version
All Forums >> [RehabEdge Forum] >> Students >> Re: physcial therapy vs chiropractic vs nursing Page: <<   < prev  1 [2] 3   next >   >>
Login
Message << Older Topic   Newer Topic >>
Re: physcial therapy vs chiropractic vs nursing - February 19, 2005 10:37:00 PM   
nari

 

Posts: 1568
Joined: November 14, 2003
From: Australia
Status: offline
Nursing also involves all sorts of biological interventions that I am glad PTs never have to perform!! Apart from that, they have no autonomy.
But a good nurse is a great asset to the health system and it would not function without them.

Still prefer PT as a profession....

Nari

(in reply to matjtayl)
Post #: 21
Re: physcial therapy vs chiropractic vs nursing - February 20, 2005 3:35:00 AM   
jma

 

Posts: 2312
Joined: August 24, 2000
From: NY
Status: offline
Not only are there only biological interventions but physical/technical interventions that puts nurses at more risk for health issues than PTs.

JMA

(in reply to matjtayl)
Post #: 22
Re: physcial therapy vs chiropractic vs nursing - February 20, 2005 4:55:00 AM   
Jeep

 

Posts: 353
Joined: March 28, 2003
From: USA
Status: offline
Thank goodness not everybody wants/desires the same in a career, and that there is diversity in parameters of what is personally satisfying and rewarding.


What may be a good fit for one, may be a misfit for someone else.

(in reply to matjtayl)
Post #: 23
Re: physcial therapy vs chiropractic vs nursing - February 20, 2005 9:15:00 AM   
jma

 

Posts: 2312
Joined: August 24, 2000
From: NY
Status: offline
There was mention of the art of PT in the ER setting. If memory serves me right, there are I think 2 settings, where PT's are exclusively used in the ER setting and it is doing very well.

JMA

(in reply to matjtayl)
Post #: 24
Re: physcial therapy vs chiropractic vs nursing - February 23, 2005 3:02:00 AM   
dosrinc

 

Posts: 335
Joined: December 9, 2004
From: Bonita Springs
Status: offline
Besides, don't ER docs get all of the chicks, or is that just on TV
Rick

(in reply to matjtayl)
Post #: 25
Re: physcial therapy vs chiropractic vs nursing - February 23, 2005 3:46:00 AM   
Dr.Wagner


Posts: 1237
Joined: January 24, 2003
From: Indianapolis
Status: offline
The answer is YES Rick...

As for PT in the ED, with current malpractice laws, the easiest way to incorporate PT into the ED is to have the patient either 1. be discharged as a patient in the ED then go directly to PT or 2. Hire a PT to work for the group to do instructional/educational teaching...but that time would likely be limited to 10min per patient or so. ED's are just to limited in bed time to treat the non emergency patients once it has been decided they are not going to be admitted.
3. Having PTs in triage may not necessarily violate EMTALA laws...I am not sure. But would pose a risk as not being an appropriate "screen". THis gets extremely touchy.

_____________________________

Dr. Wagner DO
Moderator of Medical Complexity Forum

(in reply to matjtayl)
Post #: 26
Re: physcial therapy vs chiropractic vs nursing - March 10, 2005 9:51:00 PM   
carleenej

 

Posts: 23
Joined: August 23, 2004
Status: offline
Yes, Dr. Wagner, this would be a great format for PT services, but we do not operate under a socialized medicine system. Uninsured individuals and people receiving Medicaid do not qualify for the type of management you suggest.

A PT consult may save the time & money in terms of avoiding repeat ED visits, but also assists in identifying and correctly steering what are often pretty simple cases of non-surgical sprains, strains, entrapments, impingements, etc. as well as avoids admits for BPPV, or dc's to home for under recognized gait problems, etc. Why not use our expertise. So, while a pt. waits for lab/exam results, why can't a PT make use of this time to consult and educate appropriate patients?
My two cents... :)

(in reply to matjtayl)
Post #: 27
Re: physcial therapy vs chiropractic vs nursing - March 11, 2005 4:37:00 AM   
jma

 

Posts: 2312
Joined: August 24, 2000
From: NY
Status: offline
Here's an article involving PT's in the ER. Very interesting person to address specific questions to.

"Vol. 12 •Issue 18 • Page 11
* PT on the Front Line
Spend a night with PTs in the emergency room

By Jonathan Bassett

Reggie woke up early one morning and reached for his glasses, just as he had done hundreds of times before. This time, though, a sharp pain knifed through the 65-year-old's wrist, and Reggie was stumped. He had no history of wrist pain, and had played no sports over the last few days that may have aggravated the area.

The pain was severe enough to compel Reggie to his local emergency room, at Carondelet St. Joseph's Hospital in Tucson, AZ. A triage nurse assessed Reggie's situation and transferred him to the attending ER physician, who suspected some type of orthopedic injury and ordered X-rays.

A typical ending to Reggie's story would likely have been that he was placed in a splint, told to make an appointment with his family doctor, and sent home. This may have meant a week or more in pain while waiting for an appointment. But Reggie was fortunate in that Carondelet St. Joseph's has two full-time physical therapists on staff in the ER.

"I saw that his X-rays weren't consistent with any type of musculoskeletal wrist injury," said Jon Davison, PT, staff ER therapist at Carondelet St. Joseph's. "I performed a more extensive evaluation of the wrist, and began evaluating other areas. We detected a lot of tenderness and pain in the cervical area that he hadn't noticed before."

Davison suspected an ulnar nerve irritation, perhaps nerve root compression at the C7-T1 vertebra that might have gone unnoticed otherwise. "I performed some manual treatment of the neck to reduce pain there a bit, and his pain decreased in the wrist soon after," Davison recalled.

Such stories are not unusual to physical therapists working in the ER, but they explain why urgent care and ER physicians fortunate enough to have PTs working alongside them have come to depend upon their expertise. "The ER physicians tell us time and again that they'd be very unhappy if we were taken away," Davison said.

Birth of a Program

Davison and partner Mike Anderes, PT, were therapists at Carondelet St. Joseph's three years ago when inspiration struck. Why not offer PT services in the busy emergency room and urgent care clinics, which were overflowing with patients complaining of conditions that could be served just as well or better by PTs? What followed was the action of cooperative superiors who, along with the hard work and unwavering determination of the two PTs, eventually made their dream a reality.

It started when Anderes, who happened to be treating the mother of an ER physician, approached him with the idea. Anderes was surprised to find out that this physician had already identified such a need, and had actually been pulling PTs out of the outpatient department to help with patient load once or twice a month for years.

"He referred me to the president of the physician group, who happened to have a background in occupational medicine and was very receptive to the idea," Anderes said. All parties agreed to try out a pager system, in which Anderes and another PT would remain inpatient staffers on the acute care floors, but would float down to the ER if a call came in.

The pager system didn't last long. "They began to rely on our orthopedic diagnostic skills fairly quickly, and our opinions on follow-up care," Anderes said. "Because our hospital had a heavy capitation rate at the time, we were called upon to find the appropriate level of care for each patient, instead of just funneling them into the hospital."

Many aches, pains, injuries and critical events occur after hospital hours; this places an even greater strain on staff which is already stretched thin by non-critical patients coming to the ER for primary care because they don't want to wait weeks for a doctor's appointment. And because Carondelet's urgent care unit is only open from 8 a.m. until 11 p.m., all patients coming to the hospital outside of these hourscritical or notwill be diverted into the ER by default. It soon became clear to both ER staff and the PTs at Carondelet that there was an obvious need for full-time, dedicated physical therapists in the emergency room, and an idea was born.

"We're now bridging the gap between injury and a patient's primary care physician," Davison said, adding that handling less severe cases frees up the ER physicians to concentrate on more traumatic and life-threatening ones. "From a PT standpoint, we're dealing with the problem right away, instead of forcing the person to wait for weeks to see a doctor, waiting for a referral, then dealing with what might be an aggravated condition plus secondary sequella because we waited too long."

What Do They Do?

Every patient who enters Carondelet's emergency department is immediately evaluated by a triage nurse. The nurse makes the determination whether the patient requires admission to the ER (life-threatening situations) or the urgent care department (less critical cases). Attending physicians in both environments decide whether the patient requires extensive tests (as in the case of chest pain), immediate surgery or physical therapy.

Davison and Anderes spend most of their time in the urgent care unit, working with patients with musculoskeletal conditions such as low back pain, cervical pain, all types of injury to the ankle, knee, shoulder, elbow, wrist and hand, muscle pulls, strains, fractures and other injuries. In addition, patients with balance deficits, burns, wound care and even tension headaches make up the diverse and constantly growing list of conditions in the PTs' repertoire. "Not to mention anything else the physician would like another set of eyes and hands to evaluate and give a second opinion about," Anderes said.

Generally, a 15- to 20-minute evaluation is followed by some type of intervention, from modalities and manual treatment if pain is a problem, to education and a home exercise program if the problem is less severe. Total visit time hovers around an hour.

"We've established a comfort level and a rapport with physicians," Davison said. "Most of the time they'll look at a patient's history, talk to them for a little bit, and send them our way. We jump right in, and if we find something suspicious or inconsistent, we send the person right back to the physician for more investigation."

Therapists in this area of practice thrive on the unexpected, and must be able to handle multiple patients at once while keeping a cool head. What begins as a slow morning could quickly explode into chaos as weekend warriors start pulling muscles or victims of a motor vehicle pileup are rushed in.

"This is an exciting area of therapy; it's fun, it's unpredictable, and I love it," said Heather Kuklinski, MA, PT, staff ER therapist at Midwest Regional Medical Center in Midwest City, OK. Kuklinski and partner Mandy Garrison, PT, inpatient PTs at the time, made up their minds to start a program from scratch last fall after reading about Anderes and Davison in PT Magazine and meeting with them at the APTA's Combined Sections Meeting 2001 in San Antonio.

Under the advisement of Anderes and Davison, Kuklinski and Garrison pulled ER patient logs and used them to demonstrate to administrators how many patients they could have treated, how the hospital would have been reimbursed for each, and which hours would be the most productive to have them on staff.

"Things moved quickly after that," Kuklinski remembered." The best thing about this experience was the wonderful support of our administration. By March 12 of this year, we were ready to go."

Optimal Marketing Tool

Kuklinski does admit that the early days in the ER were rocky.

"It became very clear to us that first day that nobody down here had any idea what physical therapists did," she remembered. "We didn't see a patient. They just didn't understand what place our interventions had in the ER, or why it was important for us to see them day one. We went home discouraged. And because we had already been replaced on the floor, this was basically our jobs on the line."

The two PTs diligently continued to educate physician and nurse groups on what they could offer. "Reaching the nurses was instrumental, because often they'll be the ones to make suggestions to the doctors, and many times they'll say 'let's let PT try this one.' Just when I started thinking that I should start sending out resumes, things began to pick up." Now, Kuklinski said, those doubting doctors are requesting that the PT program's hours be expanded.

In addition to the physical benefits associated with early PT, patients at Midwest who require a follow-up appointment with the outpatient division, wound clinic or other department receive a referral and appointment card on the spot. "We're able to skip a whole process," Kuklinski said.

All of this translates into a favorable experience from the patients' perspective, which is something every hospital tracks. More than 90 percent of patients surveyed at Carondelet St. Joseph's reported that they were "very satisfied" with their ER physical therapy experience. "This is very much a PR position," Anderes said. "And we're constantly hearing from higher-ups that our patient satisfaction rates are improving because we're here."

But perhaps the biggest beneficiary is the profession of PT as a whole.

"Mike and I each see more than 115 patients a month," Davison said. "That's 230 public contact opportunities to make an immediate and lasting impact on the health of a patient. As these individuals return home or transfer to various levels of care, they bring with them the positive memories of what PT did for them, and educate friends, family, doctors and other patients on what we can provide."

Words of Advice

For those adventurous PTs who may want to explore this career move or launch a program at their hospital, heed the guidance of those that have gone before you.

"Be prepared to prove that you'll be cost-effective," said Kuklinski, whowith the aid of Garrisontracks the progress of every patient they have treated as they move through the care process in order to determine whether the hospital has been reimbursed. "It's a huge project, and we've only completed the first couple of months so far, but we feel this is necessary to justify our being here."

Kuklinski also cautions PTs interested in this area of service that they will not be working office hours. "Just realize that this is not something you can do from 8 to 5, Monday through Friday, with holidays off," said Kuklinski, who (like Anderes and Davison) covers the whole week with Garrison by working two 12-hour shifts, two 8-hour shifts, and alternate weekends. "Also, rewards won't come from seeing long-term progress. For me, though, it's even more rewarding that I'm seeing injuries right after they happen, and I'm able to do something to stop pain and improve function immediately."

The nature of the business inevitably means some down time, and hospital administrators must remember to look at productivity rates as a larger average, since there are bound to be slow days. "For instance, today I might not have five patients. On another day, I might have 25," Kuklinski said.

"You have to find ways to keep yourself productive during these slow spells," Anderes advised. He and Davison will perform literature reviews, work on program development, and oversee the clinical rotations of two or three students a year who are interested in urgent care PT.

Davison and Anderes are also compiling data that they believe will prove that ER patients receiving immediate physical therapy intervention require fewer hospital visits and days off from work, and they plan to present these findings at future conferences. For now, though, they are pleased that hospital administrators are reporting higher patient satisfaction rates, lower patient pain scales, and 100 percent positive feedback from ER and urgent care physicians.

"The biggest complaint in hospital emergency rooms around the country right now is waiting time," Anderes said. "Sometimes we can cut down on that time, sometimes not. But we like to think that we're providing people a higher level of care during the time that they're here. And the results we've had so far confirm that." n

Mike Anderes and Jon Davison established Anderes/Davison Consulting to help emergency room PT programs get started. Reach them at [URL=http://www.backmedic.com]www.backmedic.com[/URL]

Jonathan Bassett is on staff at ADVANCE, and can be reached at jbassett@merion.com

http://physical-therapy.advanceweb.com/common/editorialsearch/viewer.aspx?FN=01sep10_ptp11.html&AD=9/10/2001"


JMA

(in reply to matjtayl)
Post #: 28
Re: physcial therapy vs chiropractic vs nursing - March 12, 2005 3:30:00 PM   
Dr.Wagner


Posts: 1237
Joined: January 24, 2003
From: Indianapolis
Status: offline
The above situation should work well as long as their is a seperate area for treatment...not in the ED. I would love to refer a patient primarily for non medical back pain directly to PT...ESPECIALLY THE DRUG SEEKERS...work em!

I just can't imagine too many PTs being thrilled to work the hours I work, but to those that do...they could make some cash...just prepare to see the dregs of society!

_____________________________

Dr. Wagner DO
Moderator of Medical Complexity Forum

(in reply to matjtayl)
Post #: 29
Re: physcial therapy vs chiropractic vs nursing - March 12, 2005 6:58:00 PM   
nari

 

Posts: 1568
Joined: November 14, 2003
From: Australia
Status: offline
In our main hospital, albeit a fairly small one (around 450 bed), I serviced the ER area for about 18 months quite a few years ago as a no-choice part of the job. It was an all day (bh) oncall service,
I found that there were great variations in requests, depending on the registrars and senior nurses who were on. I was asked for opinions more than asked to see this or that patient 'over there' in some hidden cubicle at the end of a waving hand. Because it was an oncall service, I could not spend hours there - too much else to do, but I found the conversations with the doctors quite interesting at times. Most of them had no idea what a PT did, but were mostly keen to know, And that would sprout more referrals.
Other times, nothing much happened at all.

It is probably different now, as one of the senior registrars is an ex-PT; and worked at the hospital in his PT life,

Dr Wag, sorry, but if I were there, I would not offer the drug-seeker anything. but I also realise you said it tongue-in-cheek.

Nari

(in reply to matjtayl)
Post #: 30
Re: physcial therapy vs chiropractic vs nursing - March 13, 2005 3:22:00 AM   
Dr.Wagner


Posts: 1237
Joined: January 24, 2003
From: Indianapolis
Status: offline
hell i was serious about the drug seekers. they are at least half of the back pain patients i see

_____________________________

Dr. Wagner DO
Moderator of Medical Complexity Forum

(in reply to matjtayl)
Post #: 31
Re: physcial therapy vs chiropractic vs nursing - March 22, 2005 2:39:00 PM   
lynx

 

Posts: 29
Joined: March 21, 2005
Status: offline
>Well the chirotalk boards could hardly be construed as objective. But that's really a different subject isn't?

From what I've read that board is very objective. The people who post generally reference extensively and allow open criticism of their points of view. The only time I have seen anyone banned was for making personal attacks.

Many discussion boards ban people simply for challenging them. So I disagree with your assessment of that board.

(in reply to matjtayl)
Post #: 32
Re: physcial therapy vs chiropractic vs nursing - March 25, 2005 2:45:00 PM   
Wisecracker

 

Posts: 70
Joined: November 15, 2001
Status: offline
You're disagreement is so noted. But are you aware that threads that varied from Botnick's position were censored by the administrator (Botnick)? Or that replies that were referenced but not part of the Botnick-party line were omitted? Doesn't sound terribly objective, but that's just me.

(in reply to matjtayl)
Post #: 33
Re: physcial therapy vs chiropractic vs nursing - March 26, 2005 12:37:00 AM   
Jeep

 

Posts: 353
Joined: March 28, 2003
From: USA
Status: offline
>>> The only time I have seen anyone banned was for making personal attacks<<<

Hardly-----
Most of those banned, you never know about. Botnick et al. does not publicly post those actions. It is an EXTREMELY censored, dogmatic site.

FYI- Chirortho/Greg Priest was among the many "banned" from chirotalk.

BTW- As for "personal attacks"-- They are not only allowed, but encouraged------ IF it fits the dogma and agenda of the moderator.


>>Many discussion boards ban people simply for challenging them.<<

Chirotalk is the epitome of such.

eg.from C-talk-- "XXX, this board lets you be here for only one reason; you claim to be chiro skeptical. Other than that single slim toehold, the rest of the stuff you bring here closely resembles trolling. Are you by any chance three feet high with long earlobes, l-o-n-g distal phalanges and sort of dappled grey skin?"


Dogma + personal attack!!

I rest my case.

(in reply to matjtayl)
Post #: 34
Re: physcial therapy vs chiropractic vs nursing - March 26, 2005 2:35:00 AM   
Diane

 

Posts: 1491
Joined: March 9, 2001
From: Vancouver, B.C., Canada
Status: offline
Er..Jeep, one remark taken:

1. out of context;
2. from a forum called "Chitchat" to set it apart from the many chiroskeptic forums that exist on that board;
3. not made by Allen Botnick himself;

..does not mean that the board is not objective.

On the contrary, it is the most objective chiro board I've found out there. It has none of the usual rahrah, isn't chiro great, aren't we all the cat's meow type of self-adulation that most chiro sites exhibit.

Instead it painstakingly points out the illogic, lack of science, lack of internal consistancy and standardization inherent in chiro education, plus the constant default of chiro schools to promotion of chiro as a way to make money. The priorities seem screwy to me. I like it because it is physiotherapy friendly. I go there to learn, but also to laugh out loud at posts, for example, about huge statues of the founders of the schools, set up in front of the schools to maintain a cult reverence, paid for by alumni fundraising instead of the money going to research. Learning that the schools charge extra for copies of old exams and sheets of answers was a revelation. A lot of the threads are about the mythical subluxation, the supposed core of all that is chiropractic, and when it dawned on individuals that subluxations weren't real.

I find the chiros that post there, most of them, frank, sane, funny and harbouring no illusions about what they've been through. Most of them have quit out of embarrassment and moved on to new kinds of work. Many mention how happy they are to have found chirotalk, it's a resting place for them. There are others who still practice and defend "chiropractic." They aren't banned unless they get really abusive.

My two cents.

(in reply to matjtayl)
Post #: 35
Re: physcial therapy vs chiropractic vs nursing - March 26, 2005 2:48:00 AM   
Jeep

 

Posts: 353
Joined: March 28, 2003
From: USA
Status: offline
My EVIDENCE stands as STATED in my post.
It is FACT- not opinion. No "Er".... needed.

(in reply to matjtayl)
Post #: 36
Re: physcial therapy vs chiropractic vs nursing - March 27, 2005 6:25:00 AM   
Diane

 

Posts: 1491
Joined: March 9, 2001
From: Vancouver, B.C., Canada
Status: offline
[URL=http://www.rehabedge.com/cgi-bin/ultimatebb.cgi?ubb=get_topic;f=25;t=001577;p=1#000032]link to chiro demo thread[/URL]

Jeep, you have quoted a fragment out of context from another thread on another board and called it evidence, but on the thread (link provided above), you state this about someone else's fragment: (posted March 27, 2005 07:22 AM March 27, 2005 06:22 AM...) [QUOTE]

>>>"To examine into the fact, condition, or cause of departure from complete health and proper condition of the human"<<<

This is in the DEFINITIONS section, clarifying and defining what is meant as an "instrument" in the body of the text.

As I suspected, it is indeed was being tauted, out of context, for some posters agenda.


The COMPLETE quote reads:[/QUOTE]This would appear to be contradictory, that fragments are agenda driven in one case and evidence in another.

(in reply to matjtayl)
Post #: 37
Re: physcial therapy vs chiropractic vs nursing - March 27, 2005 9:11:00 AM   
Jeep

 

Posts: 353
Joined: March 28, 2003
From: USA
Status: offline
Nothing contradictory at all. Let's re-examine the evidence:
--------------------------------------------------

It was posted-
">Further, the practice of chiropractic is:

>>"To examine into the fact, condition, or cause of departure from complete health and proper condition of the human"

the poster is claiming "the practice of chipractic is" ---- and then an incomplete sentence, totally lacking the topic. Where is the rest of the sentence?

--------------------------------------------------

To which I responded:
>>"To me, it is incomplete without the entire context. Can you supply the entire context of this?"<<

--------------------------------------------------

To which Jon posted a link. Aha!!! the REST of the sentence!! THE sentence that, "To examine into the fact, condition, or cause of departure from complete health and proper condition of the human", was "taken out of context" from.

--------------------------------------------------

I then posted and quoted the ENTIRE sentence.

--------------------------------------------------

You then claim that:

>> "XXX, this board lets you be here for only one reason; you claim to be chiro skeptical. Other than that single slim toehold, the rest of the stuff you bring here closely resembles trolling. Are you by any chance three feet high with long earlobes, l-o-n-g distal phalanges and sort of dappled grey skin?"<<


-is "a fragment out of context" I disagree. It is a quite complete paragraph[as opposed to a partial sentence]. However, feel free to opine otherwise.

(in reply to matjtayl)
Post #: 38
Re: physcial therapy vs chiropractic vs nursing - March 27, 2005 9:52:00 AM   
Diane

 

Posts: 1491
Joined: March 9, 2001
From: Vancouver, B.C., Canada
Status: offline
From the Canadian Oxford Dictionary: [QUOTE]Fragment: n&v: n.:
1. a part broken off; a detached piece
2. an isolated or incomplete part
3. the remains of an otherwise lost or destroyed whole, esp. the extant remains or unfinished portion of a book or work of art
4. a scrap; a left over piece
v:5. to break or separate into fragments[/QUOTE](Er..) The post from which you extracted your example was several paragraphs long, and the thread runs for 3 or 4 pages. Be a fragment large, or be it small, it is still a fragment, just part of a whole. These examples differ only in size, not in real substance. In both cases the context is missing. Sorry, Jeep, I assert that you can't have it whichever way is convenient to you in a given moment.

(in reply to matjtayl)
Post #: 39
Re: physcial therapy vs chiropractic vs nursing - March 27, 2005 11:09:00 AM   
Jon Newman

 

Posts: 1697
Joined: April 24, 2004
From: Amherst, WI
Status: offline
Just to set the facts straight as that does seem to be an issue. The "contextual quote" I posted was from the first [URL=http://www.chiropractic.org/legislation/state_statutes.htm]link[/URL]

It stated: ""Practice of chiropractic" means:
To examine into the fact, condition, or cause of departure from complete health and proper condition of the human; to treat without the use of drugs as defined in s. 450.01(10) or surgery; to counsel; to advise for the same for the restoration and preservation of health or to undertake, offer, advertise, announce or hold out in any manner to do any of the aforementioned acts, for compensation, direct or indirect or in expectation thereof; and
To employ or apply chiropractic adjustments and the principles or techniques of chiropractic science in the diagnosis, treatment or prevention of any of the conditions described in s. 448.01(10).

Check it out yourself. I figured since it was from the international association of chiropractors, it was in their interest to represent the profession appropriately and I had no reason to doubt its authenticity.

However, then I thought of my own professional organization and its shortcomings. So I went directly to the WI practice act and posted that link.

In it they do use that sentence containing "departure from complete health and proper condition of the human" but in a different context, that you addressed (versus that posted above); so something changed.

jon

_____________________________

[URL=http://www.sonymusic.com/clips/selection/30/064887/064887_03_03_30.wav]Evidence[/URL]

(in reply to matjtayl)
Post #: 40
Page:   <<   < prev  1 [2] 3   next >   >>
All Forums >> [RehabEdge Forum] >> Students >> Re: physcial therapy vs chiropractic vs nursing Page: <<   < prev  1 [2] 3   next >   >>
Jump to:





New Messages No New Messages
Hot Topic w/ New Messages Hot Topic w/o New Messages
Locked w/ New Messages Locked w/o New Messages
 Post New Thread
 Reply to Message
 Post New Poll
 Submit Vote
 Delete My Own Post
 Delete My Own Thread
 Rate Posts



Google Custom Search
Forum Software © ASPPlayground.NET Advanced Edition 2.5.5 Unicode

0.094