|
tc -> Re: Indications for tendon lengthening (Is it appropriate?) (February 4, 2004 6:08:00 PM)
|
Hi, It sounds as if you are in a tough spot. I assume that the girl is in a w/c most of the time at school. If you are school-funded, at least with the laws in my state, working on ambulation may not even be an acceptable educationally-relevant classroom goal any more, especially since she has not made progress with it in 1 year. Anyhow, the things that would really concern me about the tendon lengthening are 1. she didn't respond well to it before and 2. the baclofen pump seemed to decrease her independence and 3. your point about her possible growth spurt soon due to age. Tendon lengthening is usually done to increase range, but it also weakens the muscle and requires a LOT of work afterwords, which usually means by the PT, by the parents with the HEP and especially motivation by the child. Otherwise, you can just be making the problem worse. Sometimes these kids rely on their spasticity to function, and if you weaken it you take away function. However, you said her range is fine passively, so is it the dynamic tone kicking in that limits the popliteal angles in standing? Can you get her to neutral in knee extension in supine or prone? The tendon transfer may be more warranted, but the same problems with weakening and maybe even more importantly with this child, is motivation. If she has no motivation now, boy will it decrease after major surgery when she is in pain and then had casts on for a long time. Do you know Billi Cusick's measurements for popliteal angles? Where you have the child in supine, hip flexed to 90 and then extend the knee as much as possible? (You record the measurement as -whatever degrees they are missing to come to neutral) What is that measurement? That can give you another indication of if serial casting could improve range(or if range is the problem or if it is just dynamic tone). If you tell me the measurements, I can cross-reference it with the norms chart to see how limited the child is. Sorry, this answer seems very convoluted. But in a nutshell, bring your concerns (and any that I've brought up that seem relevant) to the MD. I think it is best to start conservative with this child given her history with surgical intervention and her decreased level of motivation. You may need to increase the education for the parents on how the child's motivation to walk is essential for her to achieve that goal and that outside intervention (PT, Sx) cannot force her to do something she does not want to do. (Just make it sound nicer than that! [IMG]http://www.rehabedge.com/forums/smile.gif[/IMG] )
|
|
|
|