|
Andrew M. Ball PT PhD -> Re: toe walking (October 22, 2002 2:06:00 PM)
|
I'd differ with Mindy on the idea about a hinged orthotic. She's on good company as Laura Case, PT, MS over at Duke (one of the best in the nation when it comes to orthotic decision making and fabrication, feels the same way). She feels that a better heelstrike is achieved with a hinged block, and I agree, especially for kids over the age of 4. I suggest, and it's just an opinion, that there are a few other things to consider.
Personally, for a 2 year old, I'd go with a pseudohinge (see Cascade's at [URL=http://www.dafo.com).]www.dafo.com).[/URL] My reasoning has more to do with the fact that the pseudohinge works, in biomechanical terms, almost exactly like the hinged-block. The difference is that it's narrower (as there are no metal pieces), and that makes it much easier for a parent to get in and out of shoes. The easier it is for a family to donn and doff, the more likely that it will actually be worn by the child. I may be a bit skewed in that I tend to work with parents with lower education levels than most, so I've found that for my population that ease of use beats a good parent education every time.
I'd rather see a near-perfect gait pattern and higher compliance than a perfect pattern that's not realized because the orhosis tends to end up in the closet and not on the kid's feet.
It's a matter of opinion, and a great example of how clinical science and evidence-based decision making must always be filtered through clinical art and clinical experience.
Drew
|
|
|
|