Femoral Anteversion (Full Version)

All Forums >> [RehabEdge Forum] >> Pediatrics



Message


David Adamczyk -> Femoral Anteversion (August 13, 2000 6:32:00 PM)

Drew and Forum,

What is your treatment approach for femoral anteversion? Specifically, what would you do for a 3 y/o with increased medial rotation / decreased lateral rotation, cannot tailor sit comfortably (likes to W sit) and ambulates with approx. 25-30 degree toe-in bilat. He also has mild genu-valgum bilaterally and has no neurologic impairments.

Thanks.

[This message has been edited by David Adamczyk (edited August 13, 2000).]




Andrew M. Ball, MS, PT -> Re: Femoral Anteversion (August 14, 2000 2:52:00 PM)

David,

Good question, it's hard to come up with a good answer though. There are so many factors to consider:

Is the problem truly one of femoral anteversion, or is the following sequence seen?

Poor abdominal control during the 4th to 5th month of development limits weight shifting and reaching in prone. As a result glut max is not developed properly and, hip flexors don't lengthen. In an effort to gain stability however, hips externally rotate in prone and the TFL tightens.

When the child finally gets to standing, an excessive APT is seen, scaps are retracted (in an effort to compensate for poor rectus abdominus control and stablize the trunk), and legs internally rotate and hips "sag" into flexion (because the glut max was never developed properly), creating the illusion of femoral anteversion.

Sometimes when kids have poor recuts control, they sit in a W-sit in order to gain stability. Some PT's claim that doing this furthers the progression of the femoral anteversion, though I've never seen any literature to actually support this assumption. In fact, it's nearly impossible to sit in that position if your femurs weren't anteverted in the first place.

That's usually where I start, and then eventually bring in orthotic intervention if I'm not getting anywhere with the top-down approach (e.g some PT's have a ground-reaction force approach - I reject this for kids, because it runs counter to development, but I'm not aware of any outcome studies comparing the two approaches).

From an impairment level approach, I'd suggest looking for an etiology, and it's usually the recuts abdominus and glut max.

I'd question why you'd want to bother with therapy at the impairment level though. What is it that this child can't do during normal play or daycare routines? If for example, the kids never sit in tailor sit for circle time, but rather short-sit on little chairs . . . then no functional limitations exist and therapy cannot be justified for giving the child tailor-sit abilities. If the child is expected to tailor sit in order to attend to circle time, or play with a sibling . . . that's a different story entirely.

Hope that gives you a little to chew on. Let us know what develops in terms of functional limitations and how you choose to approach this child.

Best of luck,
Drew

[This message has been edited by Andrew M. Ball, MS, PT (edited August 14, 2000).]




David Adamczyk -> Re: Femoral Anteversion (August 14, 2000 5:50:00 PM)

Drew,

Thanks for your reply. This is an unusual situation in that the subject is not my patient. He is actually the child of my current patient (who I am seeing because she was stomped on the ankle by her horse, but that's another story).
The Mom asked me about her son because she noticed that he tripped forward frequently when playing outside. The child is very active, strong, and well coordinated. I have not examined him in detail, so your theory may be correct. Here is some more information: The Mom stated that she has a family history of being "pigeon toed", including herself as a child and a cousin that required night leg splints to correct the problem when she was a child.
She stated that her child"s toeing in and tripping has increased over the past 6 months per her observation. The tripping may be due to increased activity outside during the warm weather months.
The boy can lie supine and internally rotate his hips to the point that the medial sides of both feet are flat on the floor as the toes touch. He cannot do this with external rotation.




Andrew M. Ball, MS, PT -> Re: Femoral Anteversion (August 14, 2000 7:01:00 PM)

Hmmmmmm,

The plot thickens. It's hard to say more without actually examining the kid. Here's some more to consider though:

For some reason, in my clinical experience, I've seen that many very well coordinated children and adults are "pigeon toed."
You will find a disproportionate number of track athletes (sprinters in particular) that are "pigeon toed."

A developmental testing may therefore be in order. A child at the 36 month level, who is tripping simply because he is trying to accomplish gross motor tasks at the 48 to 52 month level, is not really in need of physical therapy unless blatent rectus and glut incoordination issues exist. If that's the case, a few consultative treatments aimed at giving the child some games to play while in a hurdler stretch postion and reaching (fishing for velcro fish works well), and synergistic activation of rectus and serratus anterior (e.g. reaching for stickers placed on lower legs and feet) while in sitting or supine seem to do the trick. If, on the other hand, the child is having difficulty with stair negotiation and stoop/recovery skills typical of an 18-21 child, then that's a different story entirely.

If the tripping and falling is new, and excessive (5 wipeouts per day), a visit to the child's pediatrician, physiatrist, orthopod, or neurologist may be in order. It may be as simple as improving the footware, or supporting the medial longitudinal and peroneal arches, and stabalizing medial/lateral swing of the calcaneous with a good supramaleolar orthotic.

Drew




gerry -> Re: Femoral Anteversion (August 15, 2000 5:32:00 AM)

David,

Just a few added thoughts.

The amount of genu varus/valgus changes as a child grows, with greatest genu valgus at 3 years of age.

If you get the chance, it would be good to check hip rotation in prone with the knees flexed, keeping the pelvis level. Also, it would be interesting to know the foot/thigh angle to see how much of the intoeing is from the upper and/or lower leg.

There certainly are wide variations in gait during development, but the amount of intoing might be worth checking with an orthopedist. But I'm with Drew, in that I would have to see functional problems. Excessive tripping and falling could certainly fall into that category.

The family history makes it sound more like a skeletal problem to me.

Drew: I've also heard that many successful sprinters tend to toe inward. An orthopedist I work with recently said that was a myth, or urban legend. Do you know of any documentation that would support your assertion that track atheletes are disproportionately "pigeon toed"? Thanks!




Andrew M. Ball, MS, PT -> Re: Femoral Anteversion (August 16, 2000 12:07:00 PM)

Like I said, in my CLINICAL experience . . . and we all know how much weight I usually afford to that . . .

Neverthe less, there are a lot of world class track stars that are "pigeon-toed," here's the website of one of them:
[URL=http://detnews.com/1999/health/1207/workout/workout.htm]http://detnews.com/1999/health/1207/workout/workout.htm[/URL]




David Adamczyk -> Re: Femoral Anteversion (August 16, 2000 6:13:00 PM)

Here is an abstract regarding the relationship between sprinting and intoeing:
[URL=http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/entrez/query.fcgi?cmd=Retrieve&db=PubMed&list_uids=8784703&dopt=Abstract]http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/entrez/query.fcgi?cmd=Retrieve&db=PubMed&list_ uids=8784703&dopt=Abstract[/URL]

Also found on Medline:

The management of intoeing: a review.
[URL=http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/entrez/query.fcgi?cmd=Retrieve&db=PubMed&list_uids=2406900&dopt=Abstract]http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/entrez/query.fcgi?cmd=Retrieve&db=PubMed&list_uids=2406900&dopt=Abstract[/URL]

Most abstracts on this subject suggest that idiopathic intoeing typically resolves with age and osteotomy should only be considered when the problem persists at age 10-12. Also, complications with this surgery are not uncommon.

Thanks for your comments.


[This message has been edited by David Adamczyk (edited August 16, 2000).]




Monica K. Rank, PT -> Re: Femoral Anteversion (August 17, 2000 1:38:00 PM)

As a mom and a pediatric PT I would be inclined to refer this kid to a pediatric orthopedist to check the problem. It's very possible that the increase in tripping and falling is related to increased activity as well as a growth spurt. i.e. perhaps the feet have grown alot this summer and the child is having greater difficulty clearing them when walking. The orthopedist could get a baseline and monitor for change. Perhaps a derotation osteotomy is warranted. If so, he would be the expert on the best age to do this surgery.
I would expect this kid to have hip abductor and extensor weakness but the greater concern at this point is the imbalance in ROM.
Please do this quick test if you see him again: Measure hip internal and external rotation with the child prone with knees flexed. Place one hand on the pelvis to stabilize while measuring. Femoral anteversion should be considered problematic if internal rotation is greater than 70 degrees and external rotation is less than 20 degrees.
If you are not a pediatric PT yourself, you may want to refer this kid to one who can do both a musculoskeletal and functional eval.
Good luck. I'd love to hear how it turns out.




David Adamczyk -> Re: Femoral Anteversion (August 17, 2000 6:36:00 PM)

Thanks for your comments, Monica.

I recommended that they do see a pediatric orthopedist. He has an appointment in mid-September.
When I see the Mom next week, I will do a quick measurement in prone.




David Adamczyk -> Re: Femoral Anteversion (September 18, 2000 6:16:00 PM)

Just wanted to give the forum an update on the child. He was seen by a pediatric orthopedist last week.
His recommendations were no surprise: avoid W-sitting. Encourage postures that facilitate external rotation as tolerated. Gentle stretching as tolerated. No braces, orthotics, etc. were recommended.
The bottom line was that he was not concerned at this point and he thinks that the boy should, like most cases, grow out of the problem.

Thanks to all for your input. The discussion along with the Medline search on this topic was a learning experience.

Dave




Page: [1]



Forum Software © ASPPlayground.NET Advanced Edition 2.5.5 Unicode

0.047