Re: rood's approach (Full Version)

All Forums >> [RehabEdge Forum] >> Neurology



Message

Mark Hirsch -> Re: rood's approach (January 20, 2002 2:50:00 AM)

I wasn't aware that it was against Rehabedge rules to post info on this forum from the net, from Medline or from anywhere else.

I didn't indicate underneath my post that I did not author it, and I realize now that was a mistake, you must have taken offense to that.

If it is any consolation to you, I apologise to you if I have mislead you or anyone else and I apologise to the members of Rehabedge...it was not my intention to mislead.

I thought my post would be of interest to the members of this thread.

[This message has been edited by Mark Hirsch (edited January 20, 2002).]



manoonbun -> Re: rood's approach (January 25, 2002 8:28:00 PM)

Hi Mark
I appreciated for persuading me to neglect
PNF and BB technique,because your dogma but I scared I lost again.Also, I agree with Bobcat' s ideas which he posted on January 12th.
I have some idea about "reading"

Reading -----> knowing much -----> NATO
( NATO means No Action Talk Only )

Reading -----> Leraning -----> Theory setup -----> Experiments ------> Recording ----> Research and documents

Anyway, research and development mustttt
go together.

manoon bunchorntavakul



manoonbun -> Re: rood's approach (February 12, 2002 12:04:00 AM)

Dear Ranjana Pandey
We had a long discussion about stroke interventions that you raised it. It 's not exactly Rood's approach you want to know.
I have some questions to ask you
1The tools you used to assess stroke patients before and after PT treatments.
2 What's the duration from the first to the second assessment.
Thank youn forward for your reply

manoon bunchorntavakul



Page: <<   < prev  1 [2]



Forum Software © ASPPlayground.NET Advanced Edition 2.5.5 Unicode

0.047