RehabEdge homepageHost a course at your facilityCEU by topic and providerSearch for CEU by state, topic, format, etc.Comprehensive therapy products and supplies catalogRehabEdge Forum main pageReach thousands of therapists to show off your products and CEUAsk us.  We're here to help.

cervical fusion

 
Logged in as: Guest
Users viewing this topic: none
  Printable Version
All Forums >> [RehabEdge Forum] >> Orthopedics >> cervical fusion Page: [1]
Login
Message << Older Topic   Newer Topic >>
cervical fusion - December 2, 2002 2:10:00 PM   
cozziew

 

Posts: 38
Joined: October 19, 2002
From: greenville sc us
Status: offline
What about cervical traction after a fusion. It is about 8-9 p/s.
Thanks so much!
Any ideas of what to do with a pt that had L sided N&T and after the surgery the L sided things have diminshed but now has all of the Symptoms in the right with C5-C7 dermatome N&t
Post #: 1
Re: cervical fusion - December 2, 2002 4:40:00 PM   
coloradojulie

 

Posts: 413
Joined: November 10, 2002
From: colorado usa
Status: offline
Those opposite sided symptoms may be related to some localized inflammation from the surgery itself. Some gentle nerve mobilizations on that side probably would be of help to prevent adhesions.

Also check the chest flexibility. Protracted scapula can create levator scapula tension and trigger points.

I treated two fusions recently at that level from the Steadman Hawkins Clinic and we didn't use traction. We trialed it pre-op only. I do some gentle manual traction in my attempts to restore flexion range of motion. Some practitioners advocate that before you can get any other motion, you have to restore flexion. I also did a lot of muscle release work and gentle joint mobilizations, statically and actively. Progressive isometric and isotonic exercises, short flexor strength work and eventual dynamic progression (jumping, jogging etc).

I think traction would be contraindicated until the bony fusion is established...in theory the problem is corrected and should no longer need distraction as the bone plug serves this function. Focus on restoration of ROM and strength as well as decreasing muscle spasm.

(in reply to cozziew)
Post #: 2
Re: cervical fusion - December 2, 2002 5:37:00 PM   
PTupdate.com


Posts: 1490
Joined: October 8, 2001
From: Pittsburgh, PA USA
Status: offline
As Julie indicates, traction would be contrindicated until bony union occurs. However, you did not mention the time frame since the fusion occurred, or is that 8-9 months post-surgery you mentioned?

Multiple studies are showing that the levels above and below the level of a cervical and or lumbar fusion have a 25% rate of significant degenerative change within 7-10 years. This is both joint and disc involved, with flexion and extension both causing increased force.

As you treat this patient, consider this, and make sure everything besides the directly adjacent levels is functioning properly. This may reduce the future problems.

Does the patient smoke? If so, there will be greater risk of non-union. Postural problems and ergonomic considerations? Poor cardiovascular status? All these and many other things should be addressed.

John Duffy, PT OCS [URL=http://www.PTupdate.com]www.PTupdate.com[/URL]

(in reply to cozziew)
Post #: 3
Page:   [1]
All Forums >> [RehabEdge Forum] >> Orthopedics >> cervical fusion Page: [1]
Jump to:





New Messages No New Messages
Hot Topic w/ New Messages Hot Topic w/o New Messages
Locked w/ New Messages Locked w/o New Messages
 Post New Thread
 Reply to Message
 Post New Poll
 Submit Vote
 Delete My Own Post
 Delete My Own Thread
 Rate Posts



Google Custom Search
Forum Software © ASPPlayground.NET Advanced Edition 2.5.5 Unicode

0.078