RehabEdge homepageHost a course at your facilityCEU by topic and providerSearch for CEU by state, topic, format, etc.Comprehensive therapy products and supplies catalogRehabEdge Forum main pageReach thousands of therapists to show off your products and CEUAsk us.  We're here to help.

New food pyramid

 
Logged in as: Guest
Users viewing this topic: none
  Printable Version
All Forums >> [RehabEdge Forum] >> Sports & Fitness >> New food pyramid Page: [1]
Login
Message << Older Topic   Newer Topic >>
New food pyramid - April 30, 2005 4:45:00 AM   
jma

 

Posts: 2312
Joined: August 24, 2000
From: NY
Status: offline
Hello,
I heard about the new nutritional guidelines and thought it would be interesting to post the link from the APTA. It has dramatically changed and should be helpful for those who talk about it during PT.

Here is the link:

http://www.mypyramid.gov/professionals/index.html

"MyPyramid, [URL=http://www.mypyramid.gov,]www.mypyramid.gov,[/URL] presents a new symbol for the US Department of Agriculture (USDA) basic food groups, which can be personalized to fit individual needs. MyPyramid is based on the 2005 Dietary Guidelines for Americans released in January by USDA and the US Department of Health & Human Services to increase Americans’ awareness of the vital health benefits of simple and modest improvements in nutrition, physical activity, and lifestyle behavior. In addition to information on the basic food groups, the site allows users to enter their age, sex, and activity level for an individualized estimate of amounts and types of food they should eat from each group. Another section of the site provides guidance for health care professionals who want to develop educational materials based on USDA’s food and nutrition information."


JMA
Post #: 1
Re: New food pyramid - April 30, 2005 5:50:00 AM   
SJBird55

 

Posts: 2292
Joined: May 10, 2004
From: Michigan
Status: offline
You know, I still don't see chocolate listed as a food group. LOL I'm sorry, but something is off - I mean, there just has to be a recommended, healthy, needed dose of chocolate, doesn't there?

(in reply to jma)
Post #: 2
Re: New food pyramid - April 30, 2005 5:56:00 AM   
jma

 

Posts: 2312
Joined: August 24, 2000
From: NY
Status: offline
Perhaps in France, where there is great chocolate from what I hear.

(in reply to jma)
Post #: 3
Re: New food pyramid - April 30, 2005 1:34:00 PM   
nari

 

Posts: 1568
Joined: November 14, 2003
From: Australia
Status: offline
Dark chocolate has been shown (somewhere, I can't recall, I think the New Scientist) to be beneficial for the CV system. Not milk choc.
It's great brain food, fo sure, and it happens that dark chocolate is my favourite.

Another great source of chocolate is patagonia....


nari

(in reply to jma)
Post #: 4
Re: New food pyramid - May 1, 2005 6:13:00 AM   
jma

 

Posts: 2312
Joined: August 24, 2000
From: NY
Status: offline
Interesting. I heard about that but did not know where to look for it. Hope to find info from it. Could have been great to know that when I was in school for brain food.

(in reply to jma)
Post #: 5
Re: New food pyramid - May 1, 2005 7:53:00 AM   
SJBird55

 

Posts: 2292
Joined: May 10, 2004
From: Michigan
Status: offline
http://my.webmd.com/content/article/88/99702.htm

http://www.chocolate.org/health/chocprescribe.html

http://cms.psychologytoday.com/articles/pto-20030218-000007.html

(in reply to jma)
Post #: 6
Re: New food pyramid - May 1, 2005 9:27:00 AM   
jma

 

Posts: 2312
Joined: August 24, 2000
From: NY
Status: offline
Thanks for the info. Just what I need to look into.

(in reply to jma)
Post #: 7
Re: New food pyramid - May 1, 2005 3:00:00 PM   
JSPT

 

Posts: 271
Joined: April 19, 2005
From: Michigan
Status: offline
Did anyone notice the re-phrasing of some items? Particularly the "CHOOSE food and beverages LOW in ADDED sugars". "Choose" instead of "avoid", "Low" instead of "no added", and "added sugars" instead of "high in sugar".

I read an article in some publication about the sugar industry's influence over the phrasing used in the pyramid. Interesting.....

_____________________________

JS

(in reply to jma)
Post #: 8
Re: New food pyramid - May 2, 2005 5:36:00 AM   
avalon

 

Posts: 181
Joined: March 18, 2005
Status: offline
Hi All,

Dark chocolate contains magnesium and many other good food for brain. It contains also a kind of endorphin.

But even the best chocolates contains alas fat. In France the "reason" says no more than 20g/day not 20g/minute!

Choose those that contains at least 70% cacao. It is of course more expensive. We find here some with 82/85% that are near from "dam-na-tion" but may fall ourselves addictive!

_____________________________

http://www.somasimple.com

(in reply to jma)
Post #: 9
Re: New food pyramid - May 2, 2005 6:38:00 AM   
avalon

 

Posts: 181
Joined: March 18, 2005
Status: offline
http://www.totalbusiness.org.uk/LS/confectionary/octnov02/021.asp

http://www.chocolateshow.com/

_____________________________

http://www.somasimple.com

(in reply to jma)
Post #: 10
Re: New food pyramid - May 2, 2005 9:03:00 AM   
coreconcepts

 

Posts: 68
Joined: April 13, 2005
From: Vancouver, BC
Status: offline
Here's my take on the new food pyramid:

But first...

JSPT - good catch! Sugar lobbyists have an influence on this one. I know that the Sugar Association threatened to lobby congress to remove their funding to the WHO if they held to their suggestion that states people "get no more than 10% of calories from sugar additives". This contribution is to the tune of $406 Million - a quarter of the WHO budget. I don't know how this all panned out, but those are the facts. The Sugar Association tried to squash the report claiming "insufficient evidence" that sugar helps contribute to obesity, diabetes, certain cancers and syndrome X. This is a ridiculous assertion to say the least, as evidence of the connection is overwhelming. Sugar is not the only factor - let's be clear about that. Too many calories are certainly a huge factor - especially those from refined grains, saturated fat, trans fats in addition to sugar. But to say sugar isn't at least a peice to that puzzle is asinine.

Now here's what I like about the pyramid.

- I'm glad they gave the straight goods on how much exercise people ACTUALLY need to lose body fat. These seemed to have been loosened every time I looked. Sorry Jorge Cruise - 8 minutes a day DOES NOT cut it.

- They've recommended a more realistic 6oz of grains (not the 5-12 like our canadian food guide).

- I like the variablity (ie. carb recommendations are as low as 45% and as high as 65% - depending on the population) - same for fat, with protein making up the remainder.

Here's what I don't like (understand)

- Doesn't provide enough detail as to "how" to make better choices within the grains/milk/meat categories.

- Should encourage people to consume almost ALL (if not most) of their grain choices from whole grains.

- Like the recommendation of getting fat consumption from fish and nuts, but again, they need to specify when it comes to which oils should be recommended (for example, it is well-documented that olive and canola oils are healthier than other vegetable oils)

- I have a problem with them not recommending an absolute EXCLUSION of trans fats. Intead, they lump them in with saturated fats and salts (which are okay in moderation, unlike their deadly counterpart)

- As eluded to before, and as mentioned by JSPT - they've tiptoed around the sugar issue by not expressly recommending a restriction. This should replace "trans fats" as "items to limit"

- There should be more of an emphasis on simply eating less. Suggestions such as eating early and eating often should be included somewhere on the pyramid.

- I don't know why they think that measuring cups vs. measuring servings is somehow more user-friendly (as many dieticians have suggested). How difficult is it to relate things to a light bulb, a deck of cards, a fist and a hockey puck (okay, the last one may be for us Canucks only!)

Overall, they could have done better. Many details are lost in trying to condense the imformation and they should have made a point to emphasize certain things.

Any thoughts?

(in reply to jma)
Post #: 11
Re: New food pyramid - May 2, 2005 4:08:00 PM   
jma

 

Posts: 2312
Joined: August 24, 2000
From: NY
Status: offline
It goes way beyond what I first learned about the food pyramid. Not that it has been revamped, it generates more questions as well. They do have a contact link. Perhaps they can respond to your inquiries. There is always room for clarification down the road. It will be revised again in the future I suppose.

(in reply to jma)
Post #: 12
Re: New food pyramid - May 3, 2005 5:01:00 AM   
JLS_PT_OCS

 

Posts: 1684
Joined: January 30, 2005
From: USA
Status: offline
I think that's a good summary by CoreConcepts.

The meat, dairy, and sugar groups are heavily involved in creating these pyramids, just as they are/were in determining RDAs, etc.

I think the best thing they could have done, which they clearly did not do, is recommend fewer total calories and smaller portions at meals. Every successful diet program has that in common.
Like Core said, "Simply eating less" is a big issue in both our super-sized countries, not to mention our friends in the UK, Australia, NZ, etc.

J

_____________________________

Jason Silvernail DPT, OCS, CSCS
"It isn't what you're able to do that requires your courage but rather what you have come to understand and are willing to express." - Barrett Dorko,PT
**I no longer post on RehabEdge**

(in reply to jma)
Post #: 13
Page:   [1]
All Forums >> [RehabEdge Forum] >> Sports & Fitness >> New food pyramid Page: [1]
Jump to:





New Messages No New Messages
Hot Topic w/ New Messages Hot Topic w/o New Messages
Locked w/ New Messages Locked w/o New Messages
 Post New Thread
 Reply to Message
 Post New Poll
 Submit Vote
 Delete My Own Post
 Delete My Own Thread
 Rate Posts



Google Custom Search
Forum Software © ASPPlayground.NET Advanced Edition 2.5.5 Unicode

0.078