RehabEdge homepageHost a course at your facilityCEU by topic and providerSearch for CEU by state, topic, format, etc.Comprehensive therapy products and supplies catalogRehabEdge Forum main pageReach thousands of therapists to show off your products and CEUAsk us.  We're here to help.

Anterior Knee pain

 
Logged in as: Guest
Users viewing this topic: none
  Printable Version
All Forums >> [RehabEdge Forum] >> Radiology Case Studies >> Anterior Knee pain Page: [1]
Login
Message << Older Topic   Newer Topic >>
Anterior Knee pain - January 6, 2005 1:24:00 AM   
Alex Brenner PT MPT OCS

 

Posts: 1057
Joined: February 29, 2004
From: Kentucky
Status: offline
16 year old male with anterior knee pain for 1 month. His pain started after initiating a running program to get ready for high school track season. He was seen by his family practice physician who took x-rays of his knee and told him he had patellar tendonitis. He was given a prescription for physical therapy and is now seeing you today. His pain is the same. He is hand carrying his knee radiographs which are of poor quality due to the old x-ray machine from his physician's office.

What are the findings?

(all images obtained and used with permission)
[IMG][/IMG]

[IMG][/IMG]

< Message edited by David Adamczyk -- August 20, 2007 8:26:58 PM >


_____________________________

Alex Brenner, PT, MPT, OCS
Post #: 1
Re: Anterior Knee pain - January 6, 2005 6:05:00 AM   
UTDC

 

Posts: 221
Joined: December 21, 2003
Status: offline
Army,
Good case. A well demarcated, benign appearing ovoid lesion is visible within the tibia. Off the top of my head, the differentials are giant cell tumor, fibrous dysplaysia, anyresmal (sp!)bone cyst and a number of other benign processes. He needs further imaging and a referral.

Jeff

(in reply to Alex Brenner PT MPT OCS)
Post #: 2
Re: Anterior Knee pain - January 6, 2005 3:33:00 PM   
jma

 

Posts: 2310
Joined: August 24, 2000
From: NY
Status: offline
Hello,
See an ovid round growth at the medial tibia distal lateral to the tibial tubercles. On the lower lateral x-ray, can also see a clearing transparency on the tibia as well. I agree, further imaging and a referral as well.

JMA

(in reply to Alex Brenner PT MPT OCS)
Post #: 3
Re: Anterior Knee pain - January 10, 2005 8:09:00 PM   
Alex Brenner PT MPT OCS

 

Posts: 1057
Joined: February 29, 2004
From: Kentucky
Status: offline
[IMG][/IMG]

[IMG][/IMG]

The radiologist called this a nonossified fibroma. All other structres were read normal.

I remember when I was a new therapist and would see these; I would tend to get all worked up over nothing and when I reported these to the physician, he would make note of it but nothing was done. I would think in this case a call to the physician would be in order.

Fibroxanthoma, nonossifying fibroma (NOF), fibrous cortical defect (FCD), and less commonly, benign fibrous histiocytoma, have all been used interchangeably in the radiology literature.

Fibroxanthoma and FCDs are nonaggressive fibrous lesions of bone that are distinguished from one another historically by their size and natural history. Both are considered developmental defects and nonaggressive. They were first described by Lichtenstein and Jaffe in 1942 and they typically occurred within the metaphysis of growing long tubular bones in children, most commonly about the knee. Controversy continues regarding the correct terminology (as noted above) and etiology of these lesions.

Currently, the distinction between FCD and fibroxanthoma is based on the size and natural history. FCDs are asymptomatic, small, (less than 3 cm), eccentrically located, metaphyseal cortical defects; most of these spontaneously disappear. However, some evolve and enlarge into fibroxanthomas. Conversely, fibroxanthomas (greater than 3 cm) are larger, eccentric, intramedullary lesions that abut the cortex; they have a typical, superficial, scalloping pattern in the adjacent cortex.

Anatomy: Approximately 90% of cases of both lesions involve the tubular long bones. Common sites include the femur (most commonly the distal femoral metaphysis [38%]), the proximal and distal tibia (43%), and the knee (55%); most lesions occur around the knee. The tibial diaphysis is involved in only 10% of cases. The fibula is affected in 8-10% of cases, as noted in one series at the Armed Forces Institute of Pathology (AFIP). Both fibroxanthoma and FCDs are uncommon in the upper extremity; however, of those reported in the literature, 8% were in the humerus, and both radial and ulnar lesions were rare. Less common sites include the innominate bone, clavicle, skull, scapula, mandible, and small bones of the hands and feet.

< Message edited by David Adamczyk -- August 20, 2007 8:27:46 PM >


_____________________________

Alex Brenner, PT, MPT, OCS

(in reply to Alex Brenner PT MPT OCS)
Post #: 4
Re: Anterior Knee pain - January 11, 2005 7:51:00 AM   
chiroortho

 

Posts: 655
Joined: February 18, 2004
Status: offline
Army,

This is a good case. One factor to mention would be to include Ewing's in the differential. Although the NOF shown here is clearly benign in appearance, Ewing's sarcoma is very common in this age group, and particularly common in the tibia, with symptoms of knee pain.

When I first saw the radiograph I was happy to see that the tumor did not violate the cortex, an encouraging sign that the tumor was benign. However, in a young man with atraumatic knee pain and a lucency on his films, I would make sure that he sees the ortho surgeon post haste.

Thank you for your efforts in providing case studies for review.

Greg

_____________________________

Greg Priest, DC, DABCO

(in reply to Alex Brenner PT MPT OCS)
Post #: 5
Page:   [1]
All Forums >> [RehabEdge Forum] >> Radiology Case Studies >> Anterior Knee pain Page: [1]
Jump to:





New Messages No New Messages
Hot Topic w/ New Messages Hot Topic w/o New Messages
Locked w/ New Messages Locked w/o New Messages
 Post New Thread
 Reply to Message
 Post New Poll
 Submit Vote
 Delete My Own Post
 Delete My Own Thread
 Rate Posts



Google Custom Search
Forum Software © ASPPlayground.NET Advanced Edition 2.5.5 Unicode

0.078